What happens when your FBI Certificate shows a record?
Introduction
Peru, like almost all countries in the world, requires that any foreigner who wishes to reside legally in the country prove the absence of police, criminal, or judicial records in their country of origin.
This leads to many cases falling into a “gray area,” where it is necessary to distinguish between an administrative or traffic offense such as speeding and a minor or serious criminal offense. The latter, of course, completely exclude individuals from the possibility of obtaining residency, such as offenses involving weapons, theft, drug trafficking, crimes against life or personal health, or offenses against sexual freedom or minors, which we fully agree with.
This report analyzes the legal institution of criminal record expungement in the United States, its functional equivalents, and the importance of maintaining a clean criminal record for immigration purposes, particularly in proceedings before Peruvian immigration authorities. It also examines the legal strategies that can be adopted when a record appears in an FBI background check, as well as the legal limitations on the removal of certain minor offenses under specific circumstances, since the report reflects the individual’s full history.
II. Legal Nature of Criminal Record Expungement in the United States
In the United States, “criminal record expungement” refers to the legal process by which criminal records are either destroyed or sealed, depending on the jurisdiction. It is important to distinguish between:
• Expungement (effective removal): physical destruction or elimination of records (available in some states).
• Record sealing: the records remain but are not accessible to the public.
Each state independently regulates eligibility. There is no uniform federal system for expungement for most offenses.
III. Eligibility Criteria
In general, eligibility depends on:
• The nature of the offense (misdemeanor vs. felony)
• Completion of the sentence (including probation and fines)
• Waiting periods
• The absence of subsequent offenses
Typical eligible cases:
• Dismissed charges
• Arrests without conviction
• Minor offenses
IV. Offenses That Are Generally Not Eligible for Expungement
Most jurisdictions permanently exclude:
• Serious violent offenses (homicide, assault with a deadly weapon)
• Sexual offenses (especially those involving minors)
• Domestic violence (in many states)
• Serious drug trafficking offenses
These remain permanently visible in criminal record databases.
V. Considerations Regarding the FBI Background Check
The FBI Identity History Summary (background check) compiles records reported by the states. Important considerations:
• Expungement at the state level does not always automatically remove the record from the FBI database, which is the one required for immigration processes, not the state record, since the latter is limited to information from the issuing state.
• A separate request may be required to update or correct FBI records.
• Administrative violations or minor offenses may still appear if they have been reported.
VI. Impact on Immigration Processes in Peru
Peruvian immigration law evaluates:
• Police records
• Criminal records
• Judicial records
Even minor offenses recorded abroad may be interpreted as:
• Evidence of conduct affecting “public order”
• Grounds for denial or delay of residency or citizenship
This is particularly sensitive for:
• Residency applications
• Naturalization procedures
VII. Legal Strategy if an FBI Record Appears
If an old or minor record appears:
- Verify accuracy
o Request the certified court decision
o Confirm whether it was a conviction or an administrative matter - Request expungement or sealing
o File a petition in the state (before the same court) where the case occurred - Request correction from the FBI
o Submit the updated court order to the FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) - Prepare a legal explanation for Peru
o Provide:
Certified court records
Proof of dismissal or minor nature
A legal brief explaining the non-criminal nature (if applicable) - Argue proportionality and non-discrimination
o Based on principles of international law
o This is particularly relevant if the offense was minor or administrative, as it may – something we have seen in practice – prevent a family with a Peruvian spouse from residing in Peru, since the spouse would not be able to complete their immigration process.
VIII. Importance of Having a Clean Record in the Immigration Context
Having a clean record is essential because:
• It facilitates visa approval
• It reduces the risk of discretionary denial
• It avoids being classified as a security risk
Even sealed records (“sealing”) may need to be disclosed depending on the authority.
IX. Practical Recommendations
• Start the expungement or sealing process as early as possible
• Do not assume that minor offenses are irrelevant
• Always obtain certified documentation
• Prepare a legal defense for immigration authorities
• Consult both a U.S. criminal defense attorney and a Peruvian immigration lawyer
X. Conclusion
Criminal record expungement is a powerful legal tool, but its scope is limited and varies by jurisdiction. Its impact on international immigration processes, particularly in Peru, is significant. A strategic, multi-jurisdictional legal approach is required to mitigate the risks associated with criminal records, even when they are minor or historical.
XI. Adaptation for Submission Before Peruvian Immigration Authorities (Migraciones)
- Legal Framework
Before Peruvian Migraciones, the existence of foreign records must be analyzed under:
• The principle of reasonableness and proportionality (Art. IV, Consolidated Text of Law 27444)
• The right to due administrative process
• The principle of non-discrimination
A minor administrative offense committed in youth in the United States cannot automatically be equated with a criminal record under Peruvian legal standards.
- Relevant Constitutional Jurisprudence (Peruvian Constitutional Court)
• Case No. 0090-2004-AA/TC: establishes that administrative authorities must apply the principle of proportionality when restricting rights.
• Case No. 05057-2013-PA/TC: reaffirms that sanctions or restrictions must be reasonable and justified.
• Case No. 00025-2005-PI/TC: recognizes that due process fully applies to administrative proceedings. - Criteria of the Ombudsman’s Office (Defensoría del Pueblo)
The Ombudsman’s Office has repeatedly emphasized:
• Administrative authorities must avoid automatic or mechanical decisions.
• Foreign records must be evaluated in a contextual and individualized manner.
XII. Legal Argumentation Strategy
When a minor U.S. record appears in an FBI background check:
• Argue that it does not constitute a criminal conviction under Peruvian law.
• Emphasize:
o The age at the time (youth factor)
o The administrative or minor nature of the offense
o The absence of repeat offenses
• Invoke:
o The pro persona principle
o The principle of material truth (Law 27444)
XIII. Model Administrative Submission (Response / Appeal)
SUBJECT: Submission of clarification regarding foreign records
To: National Superintendency of Migration
I, [NAME], identified with [ID number], respectfully state:
I. Facts
Within the framework of my immigration procedure, an FBI background check has identified a historical record from my youth in the United States, corresponding to a minor administrative offense.
II. Legal Arguments
- Said record does not constitute a criminal conviction under Peruvian legal standards.
- Its nature is minor and lacks relevance to public order or security.
- The application of restrictive measures would violate:
o The principle of proportionality
o The right to due administrative process
III. Evidence
• Certified court records
• FBI report
• Proof of expungement or record sealing (if applicable)
IV. Request
I respectfully request that Migraciones:
• Consider the record irrelevant for immigration purposes
• Continue the procedure without prejudice
Sincerely,
[Signature]
XIV. Case Analysis Framework
For a specific case, the following variables must be evaluated:
• Type of offense: administrative infraction vs. minor offense
• State legislation: determines eligibility for expungement
• Year: influences waiting periods and the rehabilitation argument
Preliminary legal assessment criteria:
Factor — Legal weight
• Administrative infraction — Low risk
• Youthful conduct — Mitigating factor
• No repeat offenses — Very favorable
• Expunged or sealed records — Very favorable
XV. Additional Constitutional and Ombudsman Grounds (for Legal Argumentation)
A. Constitutional Court – Key Points with Favorable Precedents
- Principle of proportionality and reasonableness in administrative action
o The Constitutional Court requires that any restriction of rights by administrative authorities pass a proportionality test (suitability, necessity, and proportionality in the strict sense).
o Application to your case: treating a minor, non-criminal offense in the U.S. as a “police record” that disqualifies a person in Peru is disproportionate and unnecessary. - Due administrative procedure and reasoning of decisions
o Authorities must properly justify their decisions and assess evidence under the principle of material truth.
o Precedents: Case No. 00025-2005-PI/TC; Case No. 04293-2012-PA/TC.
o Application to your case: Migraciones must justify, through individualized reasoning, why a minor offense committed abroad would affect public order; a mechanical equivalence violates due process.
B. Ombudsman’s Office – Applicable Criteria
- Prohibition of automatic decisions (no mechanical equivalence)
o Administrative bodies must avoid automatic denials based solely on records without contextual evaluation.
o Criteria (various reports on administrative due process): emphasis on individualized analysis and properly reasoned decisions. - Evaluation of foreign records under the principles of context and pro persona
o Foreign records must be assessed considering their legal nature in the country of origin and their actual impact on public order.
o Application to your case: a U.S. administrative infraction (non-criminal) cannot be reclassified as a “police record” with adverse effects in Peru without violating the pro persona principle.
XVI. When Peru Treats It as a Police Record but the United States Does Not Consider It a Crime
Legal Issue
Peruvian authorities may classify any entry in an FBI report as a “police record,” even if, under U.S. law, it is merely a non-criminal administrative infraction.
Legal Strategy in Peru
- Administrative Stage (Migraciones)
o Submit a response brief that includes:
Certified court decision demonstrating the non-criminal nature
Legal opinion explaining the U.S. classification (infraction vs. crime)
Argument on the non-equivalence of legal categories
o Invoke:
Principle of proportionality
Principle of material truth (Law 27444)
Pro persona principle - Appeal
o Challenge any unfavorable decision, emphasizing the lack of proper reasoning and the incorrect legal equivalence. - Administrative Litigation (Judicial Branch)
o If administrative remedies fail, file an administrative lawsuit to annul the decision on the grounds of:
Violation of due process
Disproportionate restriction of rights - Constitutional Remedy (Amparo)
o Viable if there is a clear violation of fundamental rights (e.g., equality, due process, freedom of movement).
XVII. Indecopi – Bureaucratic Barriers Mechanism (Where Applicable)
If Migraciones imposes requirements or interpretations without legal basis, you may file a complaint for an illegal or unreasonable bureaucratic barrier before Indecopi when:
• The authority creates a de facto rule equating any foreign record with disqualifying records without legal basis.
• There is an unreasonable administrative practice that restricts access to a procedure.
Legal basis:
• Legislative Decree 1256 (Law on the Prevention and Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers)
Objective:
• To obtain a declaration of illegality or unreasonableness of the criterion applied by Migraciones.
XIX. Strategic Conclusion
A minor record in the United States does not automatically justify adverse immigration consequences in Peru. A properly structured legal defense—supported by constitutional jurisprudence and principles of administrative law—can neutralize its impact.
FBI Records and Immigration to Peru: Frequently Asked Questions
It may lead to questions, delays, or a stricter review by Peruvian immigration authorities. The key issue is what kind of record appears, whether there was a conviction, and whether certified court documents explain the outcome.
Yes, it can if it appears on your FBI Identity History Summary. The FBI summary may include arrest information, charges, and the case disposition if reported by the relevant authorities
Yes, it may appear if fingerprints were taken and the arrest was reported to the FBI. No conviction does not automatically mean that the FBI certificate will be clean.
Not necessarily. An ordinary traffic ticket is usually not the same as an arrest or criminal record. But if the incident involved fingerprints, an arrest, or a reported court case, the certificate and court records should be reviewed carefully.
It depends on the specific case. It cannot be said that every minor possession incident appears. However, if there was an arrest, fingerprinting, or a reported disposition, it may appear on the FBI Identity History Summary.
Not always. FBI records are based on information submitted by authorized agencies, and a separate correction or update may be necessary if the FBI record is incomplete or outdated.
You should obtain certified court records, confirm whether there was a conviction, check whether the record can be corrected, sealed, or expunged in the U.S., and prepare a clear legal explanation for Peruvian immigration authorities.
Yes. You should speak to a U.S. criminal defense attorney to review the original record and a Peruvian immigration lawyer to evaluate the impact on your immigration process in Peru.
Need help choosing the right visa for Peru?
Immigration rules in Peru can be confusing – especially when it comes to the required documents, timelines, and legal steps. Choosing the right visa from the start can save you time, money, and stress.
Book your private consultation with Sergio Vargas to get expert guidance on the best visa option for your situation – and a clear plan to move forward.
The session takes place via Zoom and can be conducted in English or Spanish.
Don’t miss out on important updates!
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter and get the latest articles on immigration, taxes, and real estate in Peru delivered straight to your inbox.
